I Have This Terminal Disease,

It Moves So Slow It Is Killing Me!





Dementia Endured

One of 25 Best Alzheimer’s Blogs of 2012

alzheimers dementia blogs

Mike Donohue is a brave man. Courageous, direct, and bold, his blog energizes readers with a passion for action. Dementia Endured gives a hint in the title as to the nature of this talented writer: he will endure. And with a personality like Mike’s, it’s easy to believe that he shall overcome, as well!

His life experiences are opened to the reader, and his journey recovering from alcoholism to adjusting to Alzheimer’s holds its own fascination for visitors to his site. Mike’s strength and determination will remind readers that dementias are one area in which it’s best not to hold any punches.

THIS BLOG IS ABOUT MY JOURNEY FROM AA TO AD.

I have survived alcoholism from which
I recovered thirty six years ago then
Alzheimer's disease with which I was
diagnosed nearly five years ago. Both
have had profound consequence. They
are associated, one leading to the other.

I write about the experience in a book
click on the title to go to it or read more
about it in the column to the right

Thursday, August 30, 2012

What It Means As We Pull It All Together


\
It'll never happen to us!

Preceding this essay I have posted the following on my Blog and my Archive:

On My Blog:
▼  2012 (70)
·    ▼  August (9)
·    ▼  July (9)

In My Archive:
·    ▼  August (12)
·    ▼  July (7)
o In Home Care Program Allows AD Dementia Patients t...
(Click on any one of the titles to go to the Blog or Archive to read it.)

The foregoing lists those essays and articles dealing with the needs of those of us afflicted and/or affected by Dementia. The first essays deal with what can be done on a local or community level without the need of government or some other super authority directing and managing it. Taking this approach there is no one to pay for it. Is up to us. I am convinced nonrtheless that we can do it and do it to our advantage.

I have come to believe the organized groups are more a hindrance then a help in getting the job done. If done by them it is complicated by more cost and less effectiveness. For profit nursing home chains operated nationally or regionally as big boxes, the kind that provide “one treatment for all kinds of Dementia and other disabling diseases,” are done at a confiscatory costs.

Between the numbers of us who already have it, the number getting it growing exponentially with the “Boomers” passing their 65th year, there is not money federally or locally to foot the unrealistic charges made for care. This forces us to the abyss of a “do it ourselves or suffer the consequence!” What is the consequence? No action will put us on the street homeless and helpless.

We live with too many misinterpretations about what is available. This alone has inured us to inaction. When we are young and middle age we work hard to raise and educate our families, we work at what we have become, and above all we work and save for retirement. Having done this we relax trusting in Medicare and Medicaid in the event things run short. As we reach the age of retirement we then learn of the delusions we have had concerning Medicare and Medicaid.

No one expects they will become disabled and too many do not get long term care insurance. They don’t because they believe Medicare will pay for it. If Medicare does not then Medicaid will.

The worst misperception is who pays when the need of care occurs. Medicare will not. In most instances Medicaid will not. Unless you are within the poverty line as drawn by Federal and/or State Government, Medicaid will not pay until you pay out your assets sufficient to take you to the poverty level. Another hooker in this is both spouses are jointly obligated to pay out of to the poverty level before one of them can qualify for Medicaid payment.

This is great for many, but… Medicaid is shaky at best and subject to open attack in many states. This puts its future in doubt.

They both must pay until their estate is paid down as they call it. Then the spouse needing the care is taken care of, Medicaid pays. The surviving spouse gets nothing. Having paid their estate down that spouse has nothing for his/her future.

Too few know this. I was among those who were surprised by this. I was a practicing lawyer for 43 years. Not practicing in the area of elder law this was something I just didn’t know. Like so many others I believed my health would keep me until I croaked for other reasons. Other reasons?

You bet “Other Reasons” We all continue to suffer the teen age disease known as “It always happens to the other guy, not me!”

I hope I have detailed this material with some degree of clarity. The situation is dire. It is a cancer that will grow unless we take the cure into our own hands!

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Eligibility for Medicaid


I have posted three articles in my Archive under the following two titles.

Eligibility for Medicaid

I then excerpt portions of two of the articles here.

The first excerpt if from  Eligibility for Medicaid.

It speaks for itself as it discusses eligibility generally and as far as I can tell it is correct in all of its aspects 

A Medicaid applicant is allowed to retain a small amount of countable assets, but the amount varies from state to state. However, most states set a $2,000 asset limit.
Countable assets include (but are not limited to):


         Savings and checking accounts
         Stocks
         Bonds
         Certificates of deposit
         Treasury bills
         Savings bonds
         Investment property and vacation homes
         Second vehicles
         Livestock
         Individual retirement accounts
         401(k) accounts
         Mutual funds
         Precious metals and coins
         Whole life insurance (above a certain surrender value, often $1,500)
         Home equity if it is over $500,000 or at the state's option $750,000 (equity is noncountable if you, your spouse, or your minor, blind, or disabled child lives there)

To be eligible for Medicaid, most states provide that you may not have more than $2,000 of countable assets if you're single. For a married couple living together (applying for benefits at the same time), the limit is usually $3,000 of countable assets. Because spouses are treated as individuals one month after either of them enters a nursing home, however, the $2,000 limit will usually apply.

A nursing home resident, therefore, may usually keep $2,000 in countable assets. If you have more than that, the additional amount must be spent down on nursing home bills until you reach the allowable level.

******Tip:           If you don't know your state's countable asset allowance figur
e, be sure to call your state Medicaid office.

Spouse is given some assets prior to any spend-down

When a spouse enters a nursing home and applies for Medicaid, the couple's assets must be pooled together and totaled to determine what portion the noninstitutionalized ("at-home") spouse may keep. This is called the spousal resource allowance. Each year, the federal government sets a minimum and maximum asset amount for the community spouse; the states set their own parameters within the federal limits.

In 2007, under federal guidelines, the at-home spouse could receive one-half of the family assets or a minimum of $20,328 (whichever is larger), but no more than $101,640.

After the spousal resource allowance has been determined by the state, the Medicaid applicant must transfer assets representing the amount of the spousal resource allowance to the community spouse within 90 days (depending on the state) of the state's determination of eligibility for Medicaid.

Tip:           Bear in mind that a married couple's assets will be pooled together--it makes no difference, for example, whether the source of the asset can be traced back to one spouse or the other (e.g., inherited funds, a bank account established by one spouse prior to the marriage, or the like).

Exempt assets do not affect your Medicaid eligibility

Exempt assets are assets that do not affect your Medicaid eligibility. Under federal guidelines, each state composes a list of exempt assets, which include the following:

        Principal home, regardless of value (so long as you, your spouse, or your minor, disabled, or blind child resides there)
         Household furnishings, jewelry, and personal effects (though some states limit these items)
         Burial funds of approximately $1,500, depending on the state
         Burial plots for the applicant and immediate members of family
         Prepaid, noncancelable burial contracts
         One automobile (for use by you and your family)
         Term life insurance policies
         Cash value of life insurance policies, provided the face value does not exceed $1,500

Example(s):          If Medicaid applicant George and his wife, Martha, own $24,000 of countable assets, a principal home, one car, and a term life insurance policy of $300,000, then only George's portion of the $24,000 of countable assets can be reached by the state during the couple's lifetime; the other assets will be exempt. At George's death, however, state authorities could seek reimbursement for Medicaid payments under a theory of estate recovery.

Simply stated, Medicaid authorities may be granted a lien against the home, collectible after the death of the Medicaid recipient (and the death of his or her spouse or other specified relatives living in the home). For more information, see Medicaid Liens and Estate Recoveries.

Inaccessible assets will not be counted

As with exempt assets, the state will not consider inaccessible assets when determining your Medicaid eligibility. These assets are otherwise countable ones that have been made unavailable to you and, hence, unavailable to Medicaid. You can make assets unavailable by giving them away or by holding them in certain trusts. Although a proper transfer of assets will preserve these assets for your loved ones, the transfer may also create a period of ineligibility before you can collect Medicaid benefits. It is vital, therefore, to become familiar with the transfer rules. For details, see Look-Back Period for Medicaid.



Discusses specifics of Minnesota. Its important part I quote as follows at it regards assets:


The Minnesota Medicaid rules look at both spouses’ assets as one, regardless of whose name is on the asset
. One of the biggest points of confusion for families is that they believe assets owned in one spouses name only should not affect the other spouse. Like I mentioned, this is not how the Minnesota Medicaid department rules look at it.

In essence, all the assets are dumped into one bucket and labeled as joint assets on the outside of the bucket.

The well spouse is then permitted to reach into the bucket of assets and begin pulling out assets for their use only.
For example, Minnesota Medicaid places assets in 3 categories and they are as follows:

1.      Exempt Assets: $3000 in cash, the primary home, 1 car, personal property, funeral/burial contracts, IRA’s (in most states protected if in well spouse’s name)up to $1500 in cash value life insurance

2.      Unavailable Assets: an interest in someone’s estate or real estate that cannot be sold

3.      Countable Assets: cash, CD’s, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, IRA’s, 401(k), 403(b), tax-deferred annuities, 2nd car, buildings or land owned.


So looking at the list above, the well spouse is allowed to begin pulling assets out of the bucket like: the primary home and 1 car. However, Minnesota Medicaid rules only allow the well spouse to pull out a limited amount of assets besides the house and car and that limit is approximately 50 % of the total assets up to $109,500.

As you can see, it would be easy for most families to reach the $109,500 upper limit of assets very easily and it's obvious that the amount of assets you have directly affects your ability to qualify for full Minnesota Medicaid benefits.

Without knowing the rules and applying proper asset protection strategies, the well spouse would be forced to spend down all remaining assets greater than $109,500.



The second and third Articles posted under the title: 


 Are correct Read them to get their gist. they detail Minnesota's application of the foregoing

In my next Blob post I will comment on it all.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Why Medicaid expansion is key part of health reform


 

Starting with the essay entitled Aging and Care. Where to take it and why, which I posted on August 12, I have been writing about the impossibility of surviving senior-hood without overwhelming wear and tear on us. In between Government which is gridlocked by its cantankerousness, the economy bought and paid for by the influence of the Drug, Healthcare, and the Wallstreet complex, every step that might be taken is barred to us unless it is a step we take ourselves.


The foregoing exists making it difficult to impossible to improve our lot. The cap to all of this making it more than impossible is the attitude of too many of the people who refuse to support what might help them. They refuse for too many reasons to list here. Some of them are good reasons, others are insane.

After “Aging and Care” my first post, I posted 3 more essays, namely:


Plus this post which includes the article posted in my archive entitled:

Why Medicaid expansion is key part of health reform


Read the posted article then read it again. Read it as often as you need to and then go directly to your bathroom and vomit!

This article undertakes to tell everything you need to understand Medicaid. At the same time it doesn’t tell you a thing. This is not the fault of the article it is the fault of the act itself. Medicaid best exemplifies all the humor about the end product of committee action.


The article begins with this statement:

The biggest misperception is that Medicaid is a universal health care program for all poor people. That's just not true. Many people with little to no income do not qualify for Medicaid.

Yes, all children up to 100% of the poverty line, and children under 6 up to 133% of poverty line, are covered. Pregnant women up to 133% of the poverty line are covered as well. So are elderly and disabled Americans who qualify for Social Security's Supplemental Security Income. But there's where things start to break down.

Did you know this? I did not! Did you know the following?

Parents are covered, but only to 1996 welfare levels. This keeps a lot of parents, even those who are very poor, from qualifying for Medicaid.

Two parents and a child living in Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana or Texas with an income of $4,850 a year actually earn too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid. And if you're not a parent, then things are even worse.

In most states, if you have no children, you can't qualify for Medicaid no matter how little you make. In most states, even if you make no money at all, there's no Medicaid for you

When the House and the Senate were debating how to cover all of the uninsured,..they disagreed Both bodies agree that those making more than 133% of the poverty line should get private insurance in the exchanges, albeit with subsidies for those making less than 400% of the poverty line. But what to do with those making less than 133% of the poverty line? The Democrats favored the idea of expanding Medicaid, as Medicaid is cheaper than private insurance. In fact, so much so that the House pushed to raise the eligibility for Medicaid for all Americans to 133% of the poverty line, above the Senate's suggested 100%, as it made the entire Affordable Care Act cheaper.

This is a radical change for Medicaid. It will finally be the fully universal safety net that many believe it already is. All Americans, regardless of age and parental status, will qualify if they are poor.

This won't be cheap, of course. States currently are on the hook for 50% to 75% of all Medicaid costs. Asking them to cover the many millions of newly eligible recipients would be too much for many to bear. Therefore, the federal government decided it would pay for the full cost of the expansion when it begins in 2014.

There are two problems, though. The first is that the federal portion decreases to 90% by 2020. That may still sound like a great deal, but even that 10% is a lot of money, and many states fear they won't have it. The second is that the individual mandate and Affordable Care Act in general will probably bring forward a lot of people who already qualified for Medicaid and just never signed up.

The federal government won't pay for them, and a lot of states fear this expense. They feared it so much that they brought a case against the expansion that made it all the way to the Supreme Court.

The court decided in the states' favor. The health care law can ask states to expand Medicaid and offer them extra money if they will agree to the expansion. The law can even refuse states the extra money if they refuse to expand the program. But what the law can't do is threaten states with removal of their traditional Medicaid money if they won't expand.

What this means is that states are free to say no to the Medicaid expansion.

Many will not be penalized by the mandate because they make too little (PDF), but that will still leave them without health insurance. In essence, without the Medicaid expansion, millions of the poorest among us will still be uninsured, with few options to rectify the situation.


Before we know anything we need to know anything more we need to know the poverty line which I find to be government most confusing secret.

I cite the foregoing from the article to both pinpoint the inequity and the confusion. To know what we have in terms of benefit you need to pick your state and know its rules.

Then you have to know your financial circumstances.

For this you need to know what the poverty line is in your state, how the federal rule is applied to determine that level.

This will be the subject of my next post.